In Bihar, elections come not with change, but with recycled dreams. Every few years, the air thickens with tall claims—new airports, modern metros, world-class hospitals, endless jobs and so on. But anyone living in the state knows: these promises are often old wine in a new bottle. When delivery fails, promises don’t shrink—they multiply. And Bihar has become the perfect example of this political pattern.
The Art of Repackaging
Political campaigns in Bihar don’t suffer from a lack of imagination. They suffer from a lack of memory. Promises made a decade ago return as headlines today. Projects announced years earlier reappear as fresh commitments. New slogans are coined to mask old failures. This culture of repackaging is not just a communication strategy—it is a calculated move that depends on two things: short public memory and a lack of accountability.
The problem is not that nothing gets done. It’s that what gets done is far too little, and far too late. Meanwhile, the gap between expectation and execution is filled with louder claims, new foundation stones, and ever more promises. And because no one asks what happened to the last big idea, the cycle never breaks.
A Culture of Incompletion
Bihar doesn’t just struggle with development—it struggles with completing development. Delays are so common, they no longer shock. Incomplete bridges, stalled roads, half-built medical colleges, and projects frozen in paperwork—these are not exceptions; they are the norm.
Worse, incompletion itself becomes an opportunity. When a project lingers, it can be revived in the next election cycle with a new ribbon-cutting event. Budgets get revised, tenders are reissued, and the same story begins again. For contractors, officials, and political actors, this becomes a never-ending source of influence, control, and, too often, profit.
In such an environment, doing the job is not the goal—keeping the job open is.
A Weak Culture of Questioning
Why does this continue? Because questions aren’t asked where they should be. In Bihar, challenging a politician on their delivery record is often seen as rude, or even disloyal. The political culture rewards symbolism over scrutiny. Rallies are celebrated more than reports. Banners matter more than benchmarks.
The media, too, often gets caught in event-driven coverage. Foundation stone ceremonies get prime time. Project delays get buried. Investigative follow-ups are rare. When the watchdogs stop barking, the system stops fearing.
The public is not entirely at fault. Many citizens are too busy surviving to track policies. But the damage is collective. Without pressure from voters, governments learn to perform for applause, not for results.
Delivery Is a Democratic Test
Development isn’t about how much is promised—it’s about how much is delivered. In a healthy democracy, delivery is what decides the fate of governments. But in Bihar, that link has grown weaker. Parties focus on crafting the next catchy slogan, rather than answering for the last stalled project. And because delivery has become optional, promises have become unlimited.
The tragedy is not just underdevelopment. It is the normalization of underdelivery. A new generation grows up seeing this cycle as “how things are.” Hope becomes habit, and that habit becomes silence.
Insightful Take
If Bihar is to break this loop, it must first stop rewarding unkept promises. It must demand a culture of completion. Political memory must be sharper. Civic engagement must be stronger. And leaders must be judged not by what they plan, but by what they finish.
The state doesn't need more schemes. It needs more follow-through. More execution. More truth. Real change will come not when the next promise is made—but when we start asking what happened to the last one.
Because when delivery fails, promises don’t disappear. They multiply. And Bihar is living proof.
2.jpeg)
